District Court Ruled in Favor of a Target Store for a Slip and Fall Case
A district court recently ruled in favor of a Target store when it ruled that the plaintiff failed to show that the company had actual or constructive knowledge of the condition that caused her injury.
The incident occurred when the plaintiff went to Target one morning to purchase a zipper. As she walked past the Starbucks store by the Target store’s entry, she slipped and fell. Plaintiff claimed that the floor was wet but Target showed evidence that the floor was not wet at the time of the incident and that an eyewitness said that she saw the Plaintiff’s shoe come off, causing her to fall.
The judge dismissed the case and reiterated the important elements of a slip and fall case, absent any of which may constitute an effective premises liability defense.
Essential Elements of Premises Liability
It is not enough for a person to be injured in one’s premises for the store owner or occupant to be liable for damages. In the state of California, anyone claiming to have suffered injuries on a slip and fall accident must be able to show the following:
-
A hazardous condition on the property that caused or created a risk of injury.
-
The property owner’s awareness of the dangerous condition.
-
The owner’s failure to take reasonable measures to prevent harm or adequately warn the public about the risk.
-
The owner’s failure to fix the hazard or provide a warning directly resulted in the plaintiff’s injuries.
-
A property owner’s knowledge of a dangerous condition may be actual or constructive. Constructive knowledge exists when the owner should have been aware of the condition, even if they did not personally observe it.
Many accidents take place in stores and commercial establishments. While it is unfortunate for people to suffer from injuries while on the premises of another person, not all accidents are due to the fault of the owner or occupier of the property where the accident occurred. Some people may suffer accidents as a result of their own negligence or carelessness.
Due to the potential high costs of premises liability claims, small business owners and companies should not take these types of personal injury cases lightly. Enlisting the help of a premises liability defense attorney is important for assessing the claim against your business and weighing the evidence of negligence or fault that the plaintiff has against you.
In Modesto, California, business owners can turn to the law firm of Van Egmond & Heitlinger, APC for premises liability defense. We have a combined experience of over 60 years in personal injury defense.
We welcome your call today at (209) 876-8886 to schedule a consultation with one of our attorneys.